Namibia’s policy debate often assumes “transformation” is a matter of effort. The binding constraint is scale: sparse demography, high fixed costs, and regional integration that hasn’t delivered a true market.
Read More
South Sudan was not institutionless in 2011; it was governed through inherited systems that outsiders misread. Independence changed formal status, not the underlying distribution of revenue and coercive power—leaving state-building efforts exposed to predictable blind spots.
The capture of Venezuela’s president marks more than a regime change—it signals a deeper rupture in the international system. This paper examines how unilateral power projection is reshaping geopolitics, energy markets, global finance, and the credibility of international law.
Namibia has earned credibility through fiscal discipline, a hard exchange-rate anchor, and regulatory caution. Yet the same posture now risks suppressing strategic experimentation—precisely as climate stress, energy dependence, and commodity substitution intensify. The next decade will reward states that can govern uncertainty, not merely avoid it.
South Sudan’s peace agreements created political containers but not a working state. The binding constraint has been administrative: payroll, cash control, revenue transparency, and basic service delivery. Mediation stopped escalation; it did not install governability.
